<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Piffle. DOS (the OS behind Windows 1.0 through 98) is not a cheap bastardized version of anything, except possibly CP/M. It's just a cheap bastard. It grew some ideas from the Unix world later.Quote:
Originally posted by Avi_drums:
DOS, the fabric behind a Windows OS, is considered a cheap bastardized version of unix by many.
The NT guts underlying everything since (including 2000 and XP) are, if anything, a re-hash of ideas from VMS (and RSX-11M before it. Which is not surpising since Microsoft poached David Cutler (their Chief Architect for NT) from Digital.
I would much rather be running Mac. They make better gear, with a better operating system, and have people who understand good user interface. None of those things are true of Windows and current PC hardware. But I just can't, it makes no economic or technical sense for me. And in my day job, we ignore the Mac as a client machine for the same reason - less than 10% of our target marketplace use them.
